5ms response time reddit. 5-5ms response time in reality which is good enough.
5ms response time reddit IIRC the response time mentioned in the specs is G2G (grey-2-grey) response time which in reality is quite different to the input lag that people are actually concerned with. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now I upgraded my monitor from a 27" 1080p 5ms flat (VRB) to a 27" 4ms (GtG) HDR curved display, and can I went over to MSI Support to ask what the MS was for the "normal" and "fast" response time settings and their legit answer was "we don't know and read the manual". S. 9ms. Response time is how long it takes the panel to change the color it's displaying. The whole point of backlight strobing is to reduce the perceived motion blur of sample-and-hold panels. 15 seconds, so more than 10 times slower. List last updated July 2023. or to be more precise i have yet to see ANY review of one. 5" Gaming Monitor 5ms Response Time 240Hz Model number: EIQ-25FHD280TFSGH Worth buying for only £110? 5ms response time though. Most response times are measured G2G, which is Gray to Gray. I think the only way to go is look at proper reviews (I might be wrong about all of that) View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. 5ms and 4ms response time. Reddit's Official home for Microsoft Flight Simulator. 167 ms Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now 170hz, 0. If you are out to have fun, and not dominate the top of leaderboards, or play non FSP games, I'd go with the latter. The very center of your eye has an extremely fast response time compared to the outer parts. The electron beams are bent using a magnetic fields. 5ms gtg This is a different thing than input lag. 9ms (response time) ju7100 - 26. Player 1 with a junk keyboard with 50ms response time vs player 2 with a 1 ms response time and with fast mechanical keys - it matters. The pixel response times they quote are cherrypicked and not based on a standard test protocol, so there's no way to compare numbers. If you're keen on competitive FPS and you're primarily interested in speed and don't care about colors and viewing angles just get a decent TN. 5ms Response Time, FreeSync Premium - $196. but why would I even want a <5ms response time Because of motion blur. The worst case scenario 60hz wait time is 1000/60 = 16. It's also probably only achieved by using the most aggressive overdrive setting, which may cause overshoot or inverse ghosting. 35 (Amazon Warehouse) Monitor and actual 5ms G2G response times for IPS displays are perfectly fine and are fine for VA panels too. Do you think it would be… What a manufacturer tells you is 1ms or 5ms is usually total fabrication. 08 ms, while midrange ones will do 5-7 ms actual best overdrive mode (not fastest, but best!) g2g response times. 94ms response time to hit 144Hz properly. Obviously I don't want to spend too much seeing as 1ms monitors go for much more than 5ms monitors. 0095 seconds. 5ms response, Freesync - $299. If it would be real, maybe, but this latency is generally not input lag but response time which is pixel switch time (and should be grey-to-grey but there is no standard so can be white-to-black which is faster generally, but not better) Any input lag as low as 1ms, heck probably anything below 10-20 ms would be perfect for any gamer. 99 ($299. Response time is simply the time it takes for a pixel to change from one colour to the next. I checked the rtings review of my monitor and it says that despite it being 1ms, the tested results were just over 3ms response time at 80% and like 17ms at 100% while the ips one um thinking about is 5ms at 80% and 12ms at 100% tested. This is most noticable on first person shooters because i feel like im at a disadvantage. Since there's no moving parts, it's possible to greatly reduce the response time. 5ms response time VESA HDR400 AMD FreeSync Premium Adjustable Stand Gaming Monitor, HDMIx2, DisplayPort, Speaker. After a few weeks this red ring ghosting formed around most things at a high frame rate. The response time of that TV may have been 8ms but the input lag was minimum 25ms, likely 40ms. Most manufacturers these days state the gray-to-gray (GTG) response time. I don't play counter strike but I also see a lot of players fast strafing at corners and behind objects to see and pick off other players, again dodging back quickly - a few ms can make a big difference. Currently I am deciding between two monitors, both are near the exact same apart from brands, the response time, and the price. Hi so im getting an LG monitor 144hz 5ms response time with 1ms motion blur reduction. Best combos of performance and value. 99 newegg comments sorted by Best Top New Controversial Q&A Add a Comment I am currently on a 2ms TN panel and am thinking about buying an LG 29UM67, but i'm worried about the 5ms response time. Contrast is ok. 144hz IPS has around 4. at 7ms gtg you are looking at something over 20ms true response time, so I Response time has less to do with how fast a monitor is and more to do with how the monitor transitions between frames. Now: $399. 1 ms (input lag) and 8. At 144hz the monitor displays a frame roughly every 7ms, so any response time equal to/lower than that will be fine "response time" is the amount of time it takes a pixel on the screen to go from black to white (or grey to grey as some companies measure, i. So I was wondering what the response time was when overdrive is set to normal. That also means a monitor with a 5ms pixel response time on the spec sheet could be great or terrible, there's really no way to know. 00) Onboard Voltage Typically the term response time is used to describe pixel transition time. VA panels have the worst g2g response time out of all the panels. so i am going to buy a monitor and currently deciding either 144hz 1ms or 165hz 5ms. 5ms (MPRT) Response Time - $269. It has a pretty… Acer Nitro XZ323QU X3BMIIPH 32” 1000R Curved 2560x1440P 2K 240Hz Refresh rate Up to 0. 5 ms persistence now). 5ms response time response time is a 100% useless stat. 5ms is 0. Reply reply werdna87 I tried switching from my fast TN panel(2ms response time) to a slow IPS(5-6ms response time) and thought that the IPS panel was a blurry mess when i moved in a videogame. It's definitely in the refresh rate window of 6. Refresh rate won't make a different regardless of if you're current or next gen - they're all capped at 60 for NHL currently 5 to 1ms response time will be negligible at best and most likely not noticeable in reality. Theoretically at 60 fps you should not be able to notice anything under 16ms true response time as that is 1/60 of a second but I don't know how true that is in practice. If the number is from a 3rd party how they measure response times may cause bigger numbers than normal advertised response times, compare it vs some other known products they test. Most average gamers today that aren’t highly invested into monitor tech won’t see any difference with anything less than 50ms. Shocking customer service to be honest but I'm really annoyed because this could actually be 4ms/5ms monitor which is actually worse than my old setup. e. Then there’s the fact that response time is misleadingly advertised, and no PC monitor today has an actual average response time of 1ms. The real key question: do you currently own, or plan on owning, the hardware required to get over 100 fps at all times in the games you play? If you're at 100 fps or below 95% of the time, 144hz doesn't do you any good. 5 is MPRT, which basically means you only achieve that at its most overclocked state AKA the lowest possible brightness level to achieve the fastest response time and least amount of blur. 3ms input latency and only 6. either 60hz, 75hz, 120hz, 144hz are most common. 1 second divided by 15ms per frame is a blisteringly fast 66 Hz There's an LG 24" which has 1ms response time 144hz but its around $270 but it doesn't look that nice as it's pretty beefy. It could be what allows you to fire the first shot and if u think, that 4 ms response time is slow compared to all those ips and tn 1 ms response time monitors, then i have "good" news for u, there are no 1 ms G2G average response time at ideal overdrive setting monitors. If you want know the actual response time search for reviews, not YT unboxing BS, actual analysis with measurements. 10 to 0. I have a 2060 super, and mainly play csgo, valorant, as well as other FPS, battle royale, or open world games. This is why VA panel are very prone to motion blur and ghosting. Hi gamers, I'm going to buy Samsung 22-inches monitor to my 1st gaming PC, but have some problem: It supports full hd gaming 1080p with 60Hz but its ok for me, only problem with response time, it has response time 4-5ms(GTG), in addition there is another monitor available to buy, its 24-inches with same specifications like the 1st one but difference only with its 1ms response time. You need OLED or microLED for that but it doesn't make a big XIMMERSE Rhino X Pro — AR headset with XR2 chip, FPGA coprocessor for controllers, gesture recognition, "4k" resolution and 5. Also response time is a measure of how fast the pixels in a display can change color and is only really valid for the strict lab test environment where they tested it. I currently have a 60hz 1ms response time monitor, and am currently looking at a 144hz 5ms response time monitor. Too many people fret about the GTG response times of monitors. Today I got lucky and I found a monitor on my countries equivalent to Craigslist for free! It is 23 inch, 1080p, but has 8ms response time. 9ms (response time) my question is will there be a ghosting issue for gaming (on any game, even fps such as black ops) and, is the input lag at a low enough time to be okay as well? sorry if this is the wrong sub, i just didn't know where else to go. I would suggest also looking to minimize your input lag (native resolution @ Max Hz). It's an IPS panel, so the colors will be better than the TN panels. Planning on upgrading to a 1180 whenever that comes out so would like to have a 1440p and G-Sync. But we can’t test that. However, once you get to 5ms or lower, there's no discernible difference, especially when you're only at 60hz. 16ms response time to consistently hit 240Hz. A different monitor may have a response time of 10ms, but an input lag of 12ms, giving us a delay of 22ms. Is the difference in response time… But now there are curved panels from AU Optronics that allow 0. Since you've haven't given models, I would pick the IPS. I'm saying a 7ms response time has a little more smearing than a 2ms response time, and it is noticeable, but it isn't huge. ” “I saw this TN panel, they were doing a demonstration in Taipei,” Clemente says, “and the picture quality is probably better than IPS. However, there are a lot of additional ms that add up. A 5ms monitor displaying at 30Hz will have the same fps as a 1ms monitor at 30Hz; each frame will just show 4ms later. Even if you're gaming at 144hz you only need a monitor with a less than 7ms response time. While a high response time is always bad, a low response time does not mean there isn't significant input lag which is what is important for gaming. Only drawback is, compared to 1ms/2ms response time of the other monitors, this one is advertised to be 5ms (so expecting "real" response to time to be higher). From what i was told there is only a difference when playing fps games, but im still unsure and confused about the whole thing. The math just doesn't add up. I pretty much need a monitor for coding and gaming at 1080p at 60fps. It's around 5ms in reality. Buying this monitor will let me stick with a better GPU, CPU and what not. The human eye is like 150-200, yes. Don't fall for it. But usually a higher average g2g refreshbrate coincides with a higher worst case like black to white, ex. " The 4ms or 5ms quoted is the G2G response time, (grey to grey. 5ms response time. 5 ms maybe. So while a 120 Hz monitor running with an always on backlight has a sample hold time of 8 ms when you introduce backlight strobing you can reduce that value significantly, taking it down to 1 ms or lower (iirc some panels allow 0. Input response, processing time is usually referred to as lag. [Monitor] GIGABYTE M27Q 27" 170Hz 1440P -KVM Gaming Monitor, IPS Display, 0. True, but the point I was trying to make is that in this instance there's enough "slack" in between frames for a 5ms response time monitor to be suitable. Is it worth it to spring for the 5ms response time? 5ms GTG time is typically a shorter time than other scales. Another example is that a 240 Hz monitor would need 4. Console has a 133ms delay just to process an input request and that’s not counting the input lag to display that movement in game so playing on a tv is about a 200-250 ms delay which is really bad that’s a 5th or 4th of a second delay so getting a monitor in general will help tremendously but also a 4 ms difference may be impossible to comprehend with the human eye but can help without you [Monitor] Acer Nitro 32” 1000R Curved 2560x1440P 2K 240Hz Refresh Rate 0. Lots of incomplete or just wrong info here. Also, those response times are usually Grey to grey, and a weighted average for the screen, meaning that some will be slower, some will be faster. -Is that an issue? I'm upgrading from a 165hz monitor, but I can sell that to cover this monitor with a little top-up. Edit: Returned it. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now 2560 x 1440 SS IPS Display, 0. It makes a difference in close quarters especially for me. So, to answer your question, for gaming, 144 Hz is superior to 60 Hz. 1 ms (input lag) and 13. Now it sounds like you're talking about response time again, since even the best displays generally exhibit input lag of at least 10ms. Plus the Asus is cheaper by a lot. The amount of pixel overdrive is usually insane and causes all sorts of ghosting issues. 5-5ms response time in reality which is good enough. So i'd like to Nov 24, 2022 · How Important is Your Monitor’s Response Time? The main difference between 1ms and 5ms monitors is, a 5ms monitor is five times slower compared to a 1ms monitor. 240hz 0. 1's with 4k, 1ms, 144 become more available and also cheaper. 5ms response time (XZ323QU X3BMIIPH) - Newegg. 5ms total response time. Moved from a TN 2ms response time monitor with 5ms input lag to an IPS 6ms response time monitor with 53ms input lag. I7 7700k 2. While it would normally be recommended to get a 1ms 144Hz monitor, you could just as well get by on a 5ms 60Hz monitor. The effect of that transition time is the crispness/blurriness of the image. 5ms Response Time 240Hz G-SYNC Compatible and FreeSync, VESA, Zero Bright Dot Policy [$450 - $50 MIR = $400] [Newegg] The difference was night and day, but, I feel the jump was more significant in terms of 60Hz to 144Hz than a noticeable difference from 5ms to 1ms however the difference is certainly there. 99 ($100 off) Monitor costco. Welcome! For PC's and general gaming, here are the most frequently recommended taken from reddit posts. Generally speaking, no it won't be noticeable. after reading some posts, people tend to say that response time is barely noticeable from 1ms to 5ms but i usually play quite a competitive game like valorant and csgo so it might be pretty noticeable. The other option is also a 24" 144hz Samsung which is about $230 but it's a 6ms but it has slim bezels and overall looks pretty clean. 9gz Gtx1050 2gb gddr5 8gb ddr4 ram 1920x1080 @60hz That said, 144hz and 1ms response times are relatively common specs these days, and most manufacturers offer relatively affordable monitors with those specs. I'd personally hold off on any new monitor until HDMI 2. So the last time I bought a monitor, 2ms was kind of the standard, with 1ms monitors being outrageously priced. No, not exactly. For your price range, that gets you something like the Dell G2724D. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. You'll get only a tiny improvement from 144hz TN. The difference between response time and total response time is the former is how long it takes a pixel to transition ~80% of the way to the intended value. 5ms monitor. It may be full-black to full-white, white to black, black to 50% gray, etc. The latency of a monitor is not related to the throughput. Posted by u/Dontforgetthat - No votes and 46 comments electriQ EIQ-25FHD280TFSGH 24. But when the monitor tells its pixels to change, the pixel response is how long on average in takes for the pixels to switch to a new image. You can push it to around 1ms average with the highest overdrive 100 Trace Free setting but you'll get too much inverse ghosting which is unusable. 67 ms whereas 240hz worst case scenario is 1000/240 = 4. Distracting to the point it has an impact on my Kovaak’s scores. But another person might switch from one to the other and never notice a difference, give it a try and refund it if things look blurry when you move. Its basically the amount of time it takes for the monitor to start working on new data and has no relation to when the picture will actually be displayed. It doesn't actually have 0. You see, let's say a monitor has 3 modes: Normal Fast Extreme If you look at the chart for the average pixels colours change response time on these modes, you'll notice that it goes faster and faster. Thanks. One factor maybe the "other response times. The best input delay you will get with a PS4 hooked up to a monitor is 9-10ms. The refresh rate tells the display to update the pixels so many times per second. You won’t notice 5ms in IRL scenarios. 1ms and 0. t=10ms the monitor with the 5ms response time will have been displaying the static image from the computer for 5ms, while the 15ms response time is still a blur as the pixels are only 2/3rd done changing color. The question I'm wondering though is this: Does exceeding 60hz with 5ms response time improve lap times and competitive racing outcomes? If possible I would like responses with experience, when you upgraded did you find yourself better, that kinda stuff. Best bang for the buck right now, unless the AOC 24G2 is in stock 1440p 144hz » Acer Nitro for budget, LG27GP850-B or Asus VG27AQ for mid range - IPS, Reddit favorite monitors. Strafes and spraying also feels more consistent. 99-$30. 5ms is the fastest color transition with the highest overdrive. You will be fine with a 9. This can only be achieved if I set the overdrive to “Extreme” but this causes horrible ghosting. Noticed zero difference in gaming, even competitive Counter-Strike. 60hz IPS arent the best for gaming, but as a first monitor it will be fine. Response time is the amount of time it takes a pixel to respond to an input. 5-inch 1080p monitor with a 5ms response time. They do it in such a way as to aim for the best possible response in standard testing methods even if it doesn't visually look the best. Issue is, monitors are often only giving you the GtG timings, and the BtW timings are usually a lot higher, which is where people get the notion that a 5ms monitor is horrible for gaming since it's stuttery/ghosting, but it's usually just due to horrible overcompensating panels ju7500 - 21. However, there is still a response time, it's just much lower than 5ms. Monitors have a better response time and input lag. I plan to use this 90% of the time for office work and watching YouTube/Twitch videos and the very occasional RTS game (I am a casual player). Good post here for monitors typically recommended for PS5/Xbox. 5ms (gtg) response time will suffice for 99. 9. The monitor with the 15ms response time will still be a blurry mess because the pixels have only changed 1/3rd of the way. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now [Monitor] (Micro Center) Acer Nitro XV272U 27" 1440p 170Hz FreeSync, . Yeah, I mean they are right in the sense the raw pixel response time is that, but there is input delay from loads of processes so it can add 2-3 ms in some case where the real world response of a 1ms panel is 4ms 25ms is the tr+tf time (time to rise + time to fall) which is also known as black-white-black response time. If you want a 4K monitor, go for it. 5ms response time gsync monitor available at Best Buy right now? $350. Basically it goes: GPU sends a frame The display does some image processing Pixels react to the instructions to show the image Response time refers to #3. Most gaming monitors that have a 1 ms response time have a refresh rate of 144 Hz Response time is for ghosting and you just won't have the issue with 16ms per frame and even 5ms gtg which is 2 color changes. The actual times vary pretty widely in real world use case as the colors and ranges change quite drastically. Kind of useless info. You're simply not able to discern between 1 and 10ms in a blind test. Faster is always better though. the fastest TN monitors are 3 ms, 2. When the screen is hit, it produces a tiny bit of light at that location. The problem is, monitor manufacturers use different ways to measure response time. I was just wonder how much of a difference there actually is between a 1ms and 5ms response time monitor. I currently use a cheap monitor that is 19 inch, 768p and 5ms response time. It shows a . They both have 1ms GTG response time, the AOC cheats a bit as the 0. For one, response times are variable based in the starting and ending color. 5ms is decent for IPS. Or check it out in the app stores [Monitor] Acer K222HQL 1080p 60hz 5ms Response time - $54. TN panels are roughly 5 times faster in response times than IPS panels. With that in mind, response time is much lower on my priorities for a monitor compared to adaptive refresh rates and color accuracy (makes a huge difference in object perception). Response refers to the length of time a given monitor or panel needs to change the properties of each pixel. And this is why I wrote that the true response time (or average response time) is not 5ms but +- 14ms and that the maximum response time will be a lot higher than 14ms for IPS panels. Now 1ms monitors are pretty affordable, but i'm also seeing the waters muddied with this "1ms with Motion Blur Reduction" feature. Im looking for the best 4K monitor for PS5 for under $500USD. The thing with response time is that due the difference in methodologies, the number reported by the companies is bollocks and in no way comparable to one-another. Generally speaking IPS has better picture than TN models. 5ms response time I got confused because the website says it has a typical response time of 15ms but can go to 5ms with overdrive. 99 After 11% Off There's your best response time for gaming. But as you mentioned, there are other factors that can affect the total latency a user feels. Everything feels smoother in general. Basically the higher the response time and higher refresh rate = motion blur. 5ms response time on the box as opposed to the 1ms on the website. Most monitors actually have a response time around 4 to 6ms, but nobody wants to advertise this because everyone else is spouting their faster grey to grey timings and since most consumers don't research shit, they're gonna buy the thing with a lower number. It also depends on the situation. 5ms response time it's kind of noticeable side-by-side but as long as you're not looking for max motion clarity you'll be fine also response time is kind of a stupid number to look at anyways cause companies are always advertise it as low as possible even if it's not very accurate of real world usage (eg. Post the actual monitor you're considering. The price of the 8ms response time is $10 cheaper than the one with the 5ms response time. Model number: EIQ-25FHD280TFSGH Worth buying for only £110? 5ms response time though. You can do the same working to find a display's minimum consistent rate given a response time. 1ms response time is mostly marketing hype. 99+Free Overdrive modes are response time settings put into the monitor that help with reducing the response time of pixels changing color. P. . But its only 100hz 5ms response time. The stated response time is almost always gtg which means grey to grey. The human eye has a wide variety of response times. A 5ms response time might seem okay, until you find out that it's black-to-50%. A black-white-black response time of 25ms is close to a gray-to-gray response time of 5ms. If your monitor is advertised as '1ms response time' or '5ms response time', that has nothing at all to do with how long it takes for an input to be registered on the screen. I've heard that on average true response time is usually about 3 times as much as gtg response time. ) The black to white, white to grey, etc. They tend to lack pixel overdrive that gaming monitors have to help fight blurring/smearing caused by slow pixel response times. TFT Central does a great job reviewing both aspects. When it comes to response time anybody who claims that they can see the difference between 5ms and 1ms isn't necessarily lying but it's likely a decent case of the placebo affect. 24in 1080p 144hz - » LG 24GN650-B - IPS, fast response time, 144hz, HDR10. There are many components that can cause lag. With high response times, you can get motion blurring, also known as ghosting. A monitor can have a 2ms response time and 30ms input lag, and another can have 8ms response time and 1ms input lag. Guaranteed you have more than a 5ms delay elsewhere along the line somewhere. a full cycle through brightness range). And it’s definitely a stealth revision to what’s on the website. VA monitors often have a worse case refresh rate of like 30 or 40ms even though average g2g is 4 to 8ms. First, the laptop is not 5ms, its the screen that is. It's a marketing lie. your opinion? The largest PlayStation 4 community on the internet. » LG 24GN650-B - IPS, fast response time, 144hz, HDR10. Disregard advertised response times. OLED response times are 4~100 times faster than the 500hz IPS, and OLED’s total response times are closer to the 500hz response times. That response time is the pixel response time, not the monitor response time, and it basically refers to how quick the pixels change colors. As I understand it, there's no moving parts involved. 5ms Response Time, IPS - $299 As someone else said, 144Hz monitors need a 6. Monitors now have active processing to improve response time by "overshooting" electrically, in such a way to mostly compensate for the unavoidable time it takes for pixels to change. You probably wont notice it, even if it is on a high refresh monitor. I'm highly skeptical of anyone claiming that they can differentiate between 1ms and 5ms on a 120hz monitor. Advertising low MPRT, usually means the panel comes with some sort of strobing backlight which does reduce blur and trailing but comes with its own problems (strobing fatigues the eyes much faster and causes Someone has linked to this thread from another place on reddit: [MONITOR] AORUS KD25F 25" Frameless eSports Grade Gaming Monitor, FHD 1080p, 100% sRGB Color Accurate TN/WLED Panel, 0. 0. Is the 5ms response time that detrimental? Or is it worth the $200 bargain? Thanks! Pre-firing actually feels like an option because usually my shots just doesn't hit in my own monitor and i can finally flick and it hits most of the time,peeking and actually hit my shots. I have a 5ms response time monitor and im getting really bad ghosting and very inconsistent frames. Just to check though, which resolution are we talking about, 1080p or 1440p? Not sure what you mean here. I doubt many people can even notice the difference between 9. Personally, I use a monitor with a reviewed 7ms GtG response time, and the difference between that and my previous 1ms 1080p 144hz monitor is negligible. com - $299. For comparison, the blink of an eye is about 0. 5ms is 1/200th of a second, meaning that the response time is still almost twice the speed of the refresh rate. I think you're confusing input lag with response time. It doesn't mean much because manufacturers don't publish the kind of test they do. 5ms are marketing lies. Acer nitro vg240Y response time I just got the monitor and the box said “up to” 0. You play in color, right? So the actual response time will be longer (10-35 depending on scene and panel). Ultrawide 1440p 144hz » LG 34GP83-AB - IPS, one of the A monitor may have a response time of 1ms, but an input lag of 40ms which, for simplified sake, could give us a delay of 41ms. TVs are catching up. Response time impacts ghosting, not input delay. what does that even mean? should i use it? also is there even a difference between 1ms and 5ms? i feel like no one can actually see the difference since even the fastest ppl only have like 100ms response time. The only issue I'm seeing is that the new one has a response time of 8ms, opposed to 5ms on my current monitor. 250ms is a quarter of a second. It is not input lag. fastest ips displays will do low 4 ms response times, like the lg 27gl850 at 4. extreme overdrive settings with massive overshoot that have low response times but with unusable inverse If I only plan on playing games at 144fps, is a 5ms response time enough? I'm looking at 1440p 144hz monitors. Most mainstream 5ms IPS panels have too slow of a pixel response time to have an enjoyable gaming experience for fast paced games like FPS. Nov 18, 2017 · 5ms gtg (gray to gray) response time is about as slow as you want to go. Your hub for everything related to PS4 including games, news, reviews, discussion, questions, videos, and screenshots. The "response time" of a monitor is simply the time it takes for a pixel to transition between two states. Having a higher refresh rate lowers the average wait time, slightly decreasing response time. I'm doing some monitor shopping and I've come across the Samsung S22D300H, a 21. True 1ms monitor doesn't exist. However if you are referring to 1ms vs 5ms, some people are sensitive to relatively higher response times, especially in fast paced competitive FPS games. But, response time is almost negligible when it comes to reaction time. Hey Reddit, I'm planning on upgrading from a real old Dell ST2410 to Dell UltraSharp U2713HM. In other words, a 5ms response time means that each pixel will take 5ms to fade from one frame to the other (that's almost 1/3 of each frame stuck in some sort of in-between state), which can cause fast motion to become blurry and unclear. Input lag is the time taken to process and then display the image once it's received by the monitor. com Open. I'm a gamer so looking for at least 120Hz (my monitor is 60Hz and I'm content with it, difficult to imagine an improvement but excited to see it for myself) and a response time under 5ms. MFGs absolutely cheat the shit out of response time numbers and dont reliably measure total display lag so who knows. 9% of everything that you'll use your monitor for. Any advice is appreciated. Then there’s overdrive, which can cause overshoot artifacts. Personally, I noticed the difference between a 1ms screen and 5ms screen, because I had them sitting next to eachother for ages, and I could not stand gaming on the 5ms screen because it felt slower. For example "4ms" g2g IPS panels are often advertised as 1ms MPRT, while in fact having the average g2g response time of about 6-7ms). Tvs are generally known to have higher input lag and signal Sep 3, 2014 · Now, i've been reading a lot and it seems that most manufactores use the G2G response time to advertise their monitors and that is just a gimmick to display a faster time. Assuming your using a 144Hz monitor, a 1ms response time would mean that the panel will spend 144 millisecond every second transitioning frame to frame, leaving 856 milliseconds for the actual frames. Flat, ISP screen, 60hz refresh rate, 5ms response time or better, 27 or 28 inches. 5ms equals to 720 milliseconds of transitioning per second, leading to less time for each frame and a more blurry picture on screen. That's where input lag matters. times may have a much bigger difference in response time than 1ms. Long story short, response time refers to the time it takes for one pixel to change from one color to another. Gray-to-gray pixel response time basically measureds how fast individual pixels can change which typically manifests as "ghosting" on the trailing edge of moving objects on your display. It's "only" 165Hz, but has 3. That response time they're advertising is not real response time or input delay, it's actually the grey to grey changing time. wwmvlvnvlyskhttmdooajdjfeixxfxmpayzgdpjopzcxwnyexdknurblunufljjlzcavhlyayqhfnxy