Under review after minor revision. They have given a major revision decision twice.

• Under review after minor revision There were 3-4 little modifications required by referees. For papers accepted after minor revision, the revised papers are often published without another full process of peer review. Jan 7, 2019 · I have a paper on an Elsevier journal with "accept, minor revision". Also, the second round took 8 months. The two reviewers’ feedback were uploaded on 2 June 2023. Did the second review after the minor revisions were done take longer than the first? Or was the first also long (80 days sounds quite long)? Thanks anyway. Decision Date: 14 April 2023 Then they sent it to the third review (with no required revision from us) on 20 May 2023. After the submission of the second revision, the status was Under Review for 20 days. The decision was delayed, so I sent a reminder in the middle of October I recently received two very positive reviews requiring minor edits in the IEEE Access journal. Now status of manuscript is changed to Editor Assigned again. Cite. PLOS ONE uses single-anonymized peer review. Then, I have made all the necessary modifications and resubmitted. If it is taking long process of review time (more than 3 weeks) after minor revision then any revised decisions can be . Souhir Masmoudi. All of the sudden the statues changed to the revised version review from yesterday. The statement was: ‘Your paper was found acceptable pending revision. Does this indicate rejection? Meaning of Awaiting EIC Decision for over 20 days About two years ago, I have submitted a manuscript to a reputed journal. ’ I submitted the revised version, and now, the status is Under Review. On December 22, the status changed to Under Review, and has remained so since then. No, retracting after reviews is not ethical. Apr 15, 2019 · My manuscript was first returned by a Springer journal for minor revisions. Jul 31, 2015 · It's important to distinguish your case of "five minor typos" and the more general case of receiving an email "accepted subject to minor revisions". 何日かは 論文誌や論文によって違うので、正確な数字は言えません 。 ただここでは例として、私が典型的だと思っている私の2つの論文(Nature communicationsとSensir and actuator IFは3. However, I just noticed that the status of my revised manuscript Oct 1, 2012 · In my field (chemistry), the practice is: for those journals that make a clear distinction between minor and major revision requests, “major revision” means that the paper will have to undergo further review after revision, usually by the same referees, while “minor revision” means that while changes should be made, no further reviewing is needed. And claiming for the paper to be accepted, only for the admissions committee to find out that it’s in fact still under review would count against you in the process. However, although the paper went under review on 6th September, the status date of the paper have changed several times. I wanted to know how long it takes for the final decision made by the editor and reviewers. Today, another of my articles was accepted. It roughly took around 19 days in total for this whole process. Minor revisions will include formatting or writing suggestions and are typically issues you can easily address. In case of a rejection, an article transfer will be considered. I have heard that reviewers are given 14 days to send their reports to the journal. However, I have heard nothing from the journal for 3 weeks, though I assumed I would receive a response in a few days. As the revision was not so difficult, I submitted the revised manuscript in the middle of August. I revised the paper accordingly and addressed the feedbacks. One reviewer suggested minor corrections and one reviewer suggested major corrections. Also, as this is the third revision, we assume the latest is a minor revision. If you're seeing 'under review', it's because the paper has been sent to reviewers. I'm in a similar situation at the moment. I spoke with Elsevier’s journal Jan 18, 2020 · After two revisions (the first major and the second minor), the Editor Assigned status means that the manuscript is with the Associate Editor (AE) to review the second round of changes and also the manuscript as a whole. I Jul 4, 2021 · On Jun 25, the status changed to Under Review right after i sent email to AE, and has remained so since then. What does this mean? Why is it taking Oct 8, 2018 · If the review is open and I know the author's name, I would consider refusing to review any more of this author's work, because there are few things more disrespectful of an academic than wasting his time. After submitting the revised article for a week, a ADM was assigned and the status has changed to "awaiting reviewer invitation. Oct 24, 2018 · I just submitted a revised paper to ScholarOne (major revision). I suppose that in most cases of minor revision, the revised manuscript will only be reviewed by the ADM or associate editor. The letter shows that the reviewers "have asked for some other minor revisions". I submitted after the revision and received a reply stating that my paper could be accepted after a minor revision (provided the reviewer's queries are addressed). There are several decisions that authors may receive after submitting their paper to one of the Society’s journals: Reject without review: The Action Editor has rejected the paper without sending it for peer review. Since the reviewer requires small changes (clear some introduction background, and correct grammar), I think it is most likely minor revision and the review time should be shorter than the first review. A minor revision is close to a contract to publish the paper if certain changes are made. After getting the minor revision letter, I immediately completed the revision in accordance with the feedback from the reviewers (the suggested changes just involve adding a few sentences) and immediately resubmitted the revision to ScholarOne. Jul 13, 2021 · After submitting major revision, I got minor revision with only one comment from editor, while one reviewer accepted it (it was not sent to second reviewer). They have given a major revision decision twice. We sent the manuscript with minor revision but now it is again under revision for 15 days. The journal office will follow up with late reviewers and keep you informed if there are any delays. Jul 26, 2018 · My case report, which was edited by Editage, received a minor revision request by a journal. For 3-4 days, the status of my manuscript status was showing to be Editor Assigned and after that status changed to Under Review. Even after minor reviews, it can take several weeks or even months for reviewers and editors to look at the paper again. After sending the query, the reviewers' comments came just within 4 days suggesting a minor revision. On December 20, I submitted the revised article. Nov 20, 2024 · The editor will then decide whether to accept your work as is, request minor or major revisions, or reject the paper due to unresolvable concerns. Dec 19, 2019 · In case of major revisions, the paper is typically sent for a second round of peer review. If you review a manuscript and struggle to formulate your feedback to reflect a 'minor revisions' verdict, look no further: get inspired by explanations, sample comments and examples! Contents When to decide Minor revision might also include providing more accurate explanations for some of the results or adding more results of control experiments that can be easily performed, that are not critical to supporting conclusions and that might not need further peer review for validation. Jan 1, 2023 · For a minor revision, the editor may decide to send the revised manuscript to the peer reviewer for a final check or review the manuscript themselves if the changes were indeed minor. Nov 21, 2022 · Read 4 answers by scientists with 1 recommendation from their colleagues to the question asked by Sanyam Sharma on Nov 21, 2022 Feb 4, 2021 · I have submitted my manuscript to a Springer journal. 2주간 with editor로 있길래 에디터가 결정을 할 건가 싶었는데, under review로 상태가 바뀌었습니다. 5くらい)の日数をお見せします。 Hello all, I have an article under review after a major revision with a journal. Reject: The paper has been through the peer review process and the I had a manuscript that was rejected after "minor revision. If you Minor changes will usually be assessed directly by the editor; If significant revisions were requested, the editor will usually return the manuscript to the original reviewers (unless they opted out of this) Rarely, the editor may invite comments from a new reviewer – the editor should explain why this fresh review is sought. Oct 6, 2021 · Hello. May 16, 2023 · Editor of a journal asked for "Major Revision" for a submitted paper, after submitting revised paper it went for the review, after that the status shows "with Editor" for some time. Just list it as what it is, under review. Comments: In my opinion, the manuscript can be accepted after minor revision. What will be the May 6, 2021 · The paper was accepted with minor revision (two reviewers both recommended 'minor revision'). After submitting the minor revision, the statutes changed to the pending editorial decision for 1 month. Dec 13, 2024 · minor revision을 요청하는 레터에서 에디터는 "your manuscript is conditionally accepted pending revision" 라는 글을 주셨습니다. Nov 21, 2020 · After two months, I received minor revision as the decision. Jan 24, 2021 · I submitted my article to an Elsevier journal on August 5, 2020. One reviewer's comment was for acceptance, while the other reviewer wanted clarification about the novelty of the results. Aug 25, 2021 · If the paper is not with reviewers, the status should be 'with editor'. After review you may get two options major or minor revision. After a couple of months of the peer review process, the response was “major revision has been requested”. Jul 10, 2016 · Recently I submitted minor revision to springer journal. For all subsequent steps, please check Next steps for publishing your article: What to expect after acceptance. -1. And I am sure neither of them was the initial reviewer. However, it is good to remember that an ‘accept with minor revisions’ decision does not guarantee acceptance. Feb 17, 2022 · However, it was under review for 5 months. Even the best papers could sometimes receive a major revision or rejection after an initial minor revision request. Sep 14, 2021 · Typically, a reviewer’s decision falls in four categories: acceptance without revision, acceptance after minor revision, acceptance after major revision, and rejection. What is meaning of this change ? The most likely scenario seems to be that the editor send your work after minor revision to the referee who was asking for it. While the reviewers had explicitly mentioned that there were minor issues, with about four issues a piece, the editor had requested a major revision. Unfortunately new referees can be invited by an editor when an old referee drops out by just not responding. ) I read the manuscript again and again and corrected a few Jul 12, 2016 · I have submitted a paper to a journal, and received the editors decision (Major Revision). Is that right? I got major revisions. It was rather an easy comment, so I resubmitted the case report after revision immediately. " Dec 17, 2024 · The academic Editor decision was as follows: Accept after minor revision. Take the list of comments and suggestions and group them into categories, and then identify which require a minor revision and which require a major revision. Dec 27, 2020 · 更新をさぼってしまった。 もうだいぶ前の話だけど、超Minor revisionだった論文を修正し再投稿した。細かい英語の記載ミスの指摘のみだったので、再投稿後すぐに受理されると思っていたが、ステータスがUnder reviewとなり、約2か月後にまたMinor revisionで戻ってきた。 最初の投稿時は査読者が2人 Apr 13, 2017 · 2 weeks of review time is really not very long, even for a minor revision (which, strictly speaking, yours apparently isn't, at least not to the editor). After re-submission, the status changed from "under review" to "decision in process". After agreeing to review, external peer reviewers typically have 10 days to submit their review. May 30, 2021 · The status of my manuscript is currently "under review" after a minor revision and I had resubmitted the revision. However, two months after submitting the revisions, the status of the submission is still "Editor Assigned". Note that the time it takes for an editor to make a decision on your revision may vary depending on the editor's workload and the time of year. Then it will take probably one month to get your work accepted. But here the chances are 50:50 depending on the reviewers comments. However, after reviewers completed their assignments, the authors do respond to Oct 6, 2021 · I submitted a manuscript to an Elsevier journal and received comments from two reviewers. . How can I add this new article citation to the first manuscript during the period under review? If the first manuscript was accepted can I add this citation at the page proof stage? Thank you for your time and attention. Reconsider after major revision Dec 15, 2019 · For a minor revision, the editor may decide to send the revised manuscript to the peer reviewer for a final check or review the manuscript themselves if the changes were indeed minor. After resubmitting, its status changed to "Editor Assigned," "under review," and after about 7 days it became "Editor assigned" again. Any article submitted to any journal goes under review if found suitable and within the scope of that journal. However, expect a slightly longer wait at this time of the year due to the approaching holiday season. The status changed to Under Review on August 30. After one week, I submitted my revised manuscript, responding to all reviewers’ comments. Apr 28, 2019 · After major revision, two reviewers gave me minor revision (only change one word) and the editor was pleased to consider publication. After that, it changed to Editor Assigned, and has been the same since January 17. The status was changed to "Editorial assessment" soon, but 2 months have passed without progress since then. (I wasn't explicitly asked to send my paper for language editing. There is no way for us to know how long it will still take, but the unfortunate truth is that I see little reason to believe it's gonna be much faster than any previous (major) revision. If the editor made a decision, it should be 'decision in progress'. Now, from my earlier experience, I am worried uf they again take 5 months to Editor of a journal asked for "Major Revision" for a submitted paper, after submitting revised paper it went for the review, after that the status shows "with Editor" for some time. The paper is still in Under Review status. When a paper receives a minor revision decision, it might not be sent for a second round of peer review; usually, the editor goes through the revisions and gives a final approval. I then resubmitted the paper a month later. Revise your paper. however, for minor revisions, the editor often does not feel the need to send the paper to external reviewers again. So we sent query to the editor. Then the status changed to “Decision in process”. Now, more than one month has passed, but the status is still With Editor’ with a change in the date. The comments were entirely new. After a while, I received a message stating that the revisions I made have been accepted by the reviewers and I was only being asked to proofread the manuscript again to correct potential mistakes. But "minor revision" means "if you do the listed revisions, and they don't meaningfully change the content of the paper, it'll be accepted". there were two reviewers, reviewer#1 said `The authors have made all the modifications indicated. 3 days ago · Peer review is an integral part of the publishing process, learn more about the peer review process, including: what the reviewer is looking for, the possible outcomes of peer review, common reasons for rejection, what to do if your manuscript is rejected, and how to respond to the reviewer comments. After 4 months received a review report with minor revisions. After submitting the minor revision, the status changed to under review and pending approval. Jan 19, 2021 · After more than a year of passing through review > major review > review > minor revision > review, the status has been ‘Awaiting EIC decision’ for the past 20 days. Based on this, it may take about two-three weeks for this round of review and for the final decision. I submitted the minor revision on the same day, status was with editor for 6 days but now its two weeks the status changed to Under Review. Nov 6, 2023 · I submitted my manuscript on April 26th and I got the major revision in the first round and “accept after minor revision” in the second round. Sep 29, 2014 · Instances of this decision are also rather rare. It should take at least a few weeks for re-review and the editor to make a decision after your revision is submitted (if the previous decision was B (minor revisions), then the timelines may be shorter). In other cases, minor revisions can often involve some substantial work, and thus, there is a possibility (although typically small) that such a paper would not be subsequently accepted. What could be the reason for the current status? Is the review process completed or are more reviewers required to [re Feb 16, 2021 · Three revisions may be one more than standard, but that could be a good thing. Reviewers remain anonymous unless they choose to identify themselves by signing their name to their Jun 13, 2018 · From wht I understand, you have re-submitted your manuscript after revision to the same journal and the status has changed from ‘Under review’ to ‘Revision’. Mar 12, 2021 · This list will guide your revision of the paper. After one day of submission, status was ‘Awaiting Decision’; but now after 10 days, status change into ‘Awaiting reviewer selection’. 'Minor revisions’ means that a manuscript only has to undergo small changes and improvements before it can be published in an academic journal. My revised manuscript (after minor revision) is still under review for more than 3 months and I have not any response yet. I am anxious if there is any problem It is likely possible when paper sent new reviewer than earlier reviewers. It all depends on the editor to adjudge the comments base on the merit of the paper. After waiting 20 days for pending approval, the status now is reviewers invited. I have submitted my paper to a Sage journal. After the first review, it came back for a major revision. It is slightly strange that the status 'Revision' is being displayed now although the submission system did not show this status during the previous rounds of review. The day I submitted the revised version, the status was ‘With Editor'. In addition, the academic editor initially assigned to it was also changed. – Nov 6, 2020 · I recently resubmitted a manuscript after making major revisions. On December 5, I received a minor revision decision from one reviewer and a major revision decision from the other. The status was "With Editor" for three weeks, then it changed to "Under review". Now, again it Oct 13, 2020 · I had submitted my paper to a reputed journal. Université de Saint-Etienne. It means the journal is quite interested in your article and is seeking to make it as robust as possible for publication. 3 months later of submitting the revised (R1) version, I have received again the review report for Minor revision further required. In fact, I have submitted it on the 21st November 2019. However, after I performed minor edits and resubmitted it, it went to under-review. Congratulations! Hi all, I am wondering how the minor revision sent back to review finally worked out. " What was odd was that the two reviewers for the second round did not talk about my revision at all, but treated the manuscript as a new submission. The fate of the manuscript can not be predicted for a Feb 28, 2023 · I sent a paper to Journal of Cleaner Production and finally got minor revision after 6months. Dec 30, 2019 · I submitted my revised manuscript to the journal after incorporating the reviewer's comments. Nov 7, 2017 · I submitted a manuscript to a BMC journal in the middle of July, and received a decision of minor revision in August. major revision 때는 2일만에 under review로 바뀌었는데. 2.