Debian samba gui ubuntu reddit and of course is more insecure. Hopefully, someone with more direct knowledge of Debian will come along and fill in details. Well, Ubuntu is based on Debian Testing, so you get newer packages that can have more bugs than the rock solid Debian Stable. Proxmox is literally Debian with some preinstalled software. Throughout the article, I have mentioned different GUI utilities for Samba share in a simplified process. For a GUI file manager, I am quite pleased with dolphin. But the LTS support extending for 10 years would be great for us. It's relatively hard to break it. What’s the advantage of My NAS is a minimal Debian 11 running Cockpit with web UI add-ons Imagine the two distros as car enthusiasts, Debian is the guys who quite happy to be up to his arm pits in oil and grease tweaking his distro to get what he wants from it, where Ubuntu wants the same as the the Debian guy but does not want to be up to his arm pits in Grease and oil and is happy to let somebody else do the hard graft while he just enjoys the driving To OP: to elaborate further - Samba is generally better hardened than Microsoft implementations of SMB/CIFS in terms of UB/bounds related issues but due to weaknesses in the protocol itself locking it down (check the documentation on samba wiki about mitigation against Wannacry and similar exploits) and keeping it only available to local network (eg using firewall on the Ubuntu As with Option 1, there is no graphical file manager in this NAS; although, there could be if Ubuntu desktop is installed as the "NAS" OS. I have a Samba share mounted in my Mac (daily driver) and an NFS share mounted in an Ubuntu desktop VM (running in Parallels on my Mac) for navigating the folders using a GUI when preferred. I've referenced this post, this other one, that one, this page and the man which have aided me greatly in allowing for automatic mounting of Samba shares from a remote server on my LAN to my local Ubuntu 18. And it's not Debian or a user problem. Switching Debian uses the synaptic package manager to install from the repositories with a gui. I hear a lot of people recommend mint, since both are based off of ubuntu what makes pop (or mint) so special. a. I am currently experimenting with using Fedora Workstation using the gui for everything. 04 . Something is definitely wrong, if nowadays one gets advice to read docs to install "user-friendly" desktop OS with GUI installer. The traditional Debian installer will ask you to provide a Fully Qualified Domain Name. Is a GUI, command line or should i SSH into it from my desk top? Just to add I am using same username and password on both the ubuntu and windows machines. It creates a new session. It's a Linux community problem. Ubuntu LTS releases are based on Debian testing branch. storage Afternoon all. Server 2: Fedora, Ubuntu, Debian (whichever you choose) + Cockpit + cockpit-machines Gives you a server GUI and you can either ssh via the web terminal in cockpit UI or make changes within the web GUI itself that will make the changes on the other server. target` But now I have no I recently switched to Debian Linux because I don't wanna be Microsoft's slave anymore FL Studio works well so far via Bottles. If you created the share in nautilus (the GUI) then the share is probably in This guide will equip you with the required knowledge on how to configure Samba Share on Debian. Btw, I've used Ubuntu in the past but I'm trying to see what the advantages and possibly disadvantages are with pop over ubuntu and/or mint Hello, I am currently using Ubuntu and want to make a switch, I have narrowed it down to 2 options, linux mint and Debian, I am not very familiar with both, important details for you to help me: I know my way around linux a bit and the cl. 1 – Install Samba Packages. With Ubuntu and all the derivatives being based off of the testing branch, some of the packages aren't as good as they could be and have bugs and glitches or whatnot. I think Samba 3 is pretty well understood. Arch specially, Debian, Fedora, Gentoo, have some kind of edgyness in telling others to PFO (Please fuck off) that due nature of big part of community in Ubuntu they dont (I even think the Advanced users like Ubuntu community as they can fill that role of helping others in part to the good-feeling aspect of helping others) more than "compete" on who is better. Last but not least I would be nice have some sort of automatic updates for the windows machines. Honestly, just adding "non-free" and "contrib" to your sources list ("non-free-firmware" is there by default) and selecting Gnome as the default gets you to 95% Ubuntu. Release schedule is stable and it is throughly tested, meaning when you do your test updates, it will not bring down your Get the Reddit app Scan this Struggling with Samba share in Ubuntu 22. Use an alternative Samba GUI such as "gadmin-samba". Made these Debian logos because i was bored 2. I cant access denied when try from windows. org - Samba Ubuntu Samba GUI (Graphical User Interface) is an assembly of graphical tools and services that provide a user-friendly interface and let users configure and manage the Samba shares very easily on Ubuntu. In fact, it allows 4 sessions although multiple sessions with the same user doesn't work so well at least with gnome. Ubuntu has a 6 month lifecycle, with 2 year lifecycle for LTS. If you want Active Directory type stuff, take a look at Samba-AD and don't pay out of your own pocket to get MSAD and a RSAT-like experience, because MS-RSAT works with Samba-AD out of the box. Ubuntu focusses on being more user-friendly. In fact, there are now several GUI interfaces to Samba available. And, I'm tired of going in circles. Only devices on the local network can access it, however as it is free I'd like to enable encryption and signing. That being said, configuring Samba from the command line isn't too hard. do you know if SAMBA is supported on Ubuntu Pro Servers? With supported I mean if ubuntu enterprise supports takes care if a bug happens. AWS Linux 2022 is moving to Fedora based, which throws a wrench into established workflows/build patterns, so that might be the push for my group to switch to Debian/Ubuntu instead. I've installed Ubuntu server 12. If you’re an experienced user, you could run Debian and make it behave like Ubuntu without any issues. run a basic LXC template like Debian or Ubuntu and simply install Cockpit plus filesharing addon to it. For encryption, I added to the smb. Any reasons to choose Ubuntu over Debian? 225K subscribers in the Ubuntu community. I'm thinking of running Kubuntu 21. I gave up and installed samba on I installed Debian from iso on usb in an old windows 7 pc. I am planning on using winexe but there is probably a better solution. It's what I'm currently doing now, migrating my servers from physical Ubuntu desktop, minimal gui (but still gui) and going to one central build with proxmox, and Ubuntu server running all my docker containers, and any OS I use, is usually Ubuntu server and it works great! I have learned so much just in the last week alone! Personally I'd go CentOS/Rocky but Debian is a very good choice as well. Thank god for Distrowatch. Start with Debian's documentation instead of random YT videos. With Debian 12 just out, that will not be a problem for, say, 6 months. The Ubuntu community on Reddit Members Online If you really want a traditional GUI, install ubuntu server and then install lxde. Reply reply Fl0wedm That horrible GUI is Gnome, which insanely Debian developers like to mislead people by calling it Debian desktop environment in the installer. 04 and have it set up as a file server using SMB. Ubuntu Debian openSUSE Pay for RHEL All of those solutions have problems so I'm really not sure what is going to happen. I loaded up Wireshark and noticed that every time name resolution fails it is trying to do some kind of negotiation over port 139, and when it works it’s only doing port 445. Members Online. Subreddit to discuss all the Debian things, the Universal Operating System Members Online. The host is a desktop running Manjaro KDE, we also have Windows laptops, Apple laptops, and some random lesser devices that occasionally access data like raspberry pi or Nvidia Shield TV. For reference in the past I used an Unraid server and setup a passwordless smb share and Ubuntu file explorer and GUI handled that just fine. I would like some additional flexibility to manage my NAS, similar to the web GUI of Synology and QNAP. How do I install a GUI in command line? Currently cockpit-samba-ad-dc is the best option but it looks like it is not well maintained. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now getting involved with the terminal and running commands (Ubuntu Server or Debian) versus configuring a server via a graphical interface (MineOS). 10 on an old computer that someone gave me. The last time I used Linux was in 2017 with Mint and Ubuntu. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. 04 is that Jessie uses systemd as its init system, which is much newer and less proven than Ubuntu's upstart. I recently installed Debian 11 on my server. 04 LTS installed (Hyper-V vm for testing but will be a physical box) Samba and Winbind running One of the best choices for VM/container hosting is Proxmox. It's your problem but maybe you'll understand it as you age. 7. If you've decided on Ubuntu, i would recommend starting with the current LTS release of Ubuntu Desktop. That said, I think most Ubuntu developers are very aware of the dependency and push updates back upstream to Debian. The Ubuntu one has a boot drive and 2 /media/ drives for mass storage and I set them up as network drives so I Ubuntu has been a major beneficiary of the high quality of Debian, and the Ubuntu "child" distros such as Mint are also dependent upon the quality and stability of the Debian core. 04 machine with GNOME GUI. Debian feels like an Enterprise grade operating system. :P I still haven't figured out to get shares working in Samba. Yep, OMV doesn't bring any additional networking functionality. "TechRepublic - 5 Tools for Configuring Samba" mentions a few option. Is there a decent GUI for mounting network (smb) shares in Linux systems yet? I have used both Gnome and KDE and their respective file managers can View community ranking In the Top 5% of largest communities on Reddit. OMV seems like something between Unraid/truenas and Ubuntu Server, but i don't feel like learning Debian. restart the samba service. use the testparm command to verify the config. That said, AWS Ubuntu images also ship with AWS packages pre-installed, like AWS CLI and SSM, the two most critical parts. Some of them are listed below and I will add the others as soon as I can find the URLs. The biggest difference between a base install of Debian Jessie and Ubuntu 14. I tried Ubuntu first, and had several installations fail. you can install the samba packages. Gnome looks nice and it's obviously the most popular choice, but it seems to just introduce all this unwanted stuff right back in. conf file to enable the homes share , and add any other specifc shares I want. I initially set up the server using a GUI/CL and have since killed the GUI and am running the server headless in a different room (I don't like harddrive noise). I've been running Linux for around 3 years now and I can mostly manage things myself. So yeah, everything about your sentence is wrong. I'm currently using Samba to share files in my home with multiple users and multiple devices. Ubuntu LTS is supported for 5 years where Debian stable is for 3 years. It sounds like you know what you are doing. Debian and Ubuntu are going to share the same basic software, since Ubuntu is a Debian derivative. Feeling a bit overwhelmed about how to begin installing some dockers. Just take the example and mod it for your Do you know of an easy to use modern web interface for managing Samba users and shares? Even a simple PHP page would suffice if it gets the job done. The LTS versions are only upgraded every two years and more effort is put into making them stable. This is finally starting to happen. Debian is not more complicated than Ubuntu, it is possible that at the beginning you will be a little confused but overall they are two very similar OS, Ubuntu is based on Debian. The Ubuntu community on Reddit In Arch it can be solved, for now, by downgrading to previous version (from 4. Also debian has way less overhead compared to Ubuntu I do everything for my fileserver (just Debian LXC container running samba & avahi) from the CLI anyways at this point so it doesn't hugely affect me. Similar to Webmin upvotes Hello. TrueNas provides a nice GUI to set up a NAS: user accounts, pools and datasets, shares set up, virtual machines, snapshots, etc. 21 votes, 34 comments. Debian stable has an about 2 year lifecycle. The steps I've followed are as follows: 1) Created a mounting point on the local system by ~$ sudo mkdir /media/HHAdmin So, I have a samba server running on an Ubuntu machine in my local network. I was able to share the folder correctly, i can see it from both windows and ubuntu. I am attempting to restrict logins to Ubuntu Server via AD group. Now I know what I can and can't do, as well as how to quickly set it up. 04. Again, easily done via command line, but easier with the webUI. 6). 04 with kde-backports, or run Debian 11 (maybe sid) with KDE. Or (Ubuntu+LXQT - at the time of the purchase I had problems installing Debian but it's okay). The advantage with Debian is that you will have the opportunity to explore a little deeper the Linux ecosysteme with a distribution that remains very stable. edit the /etc/samba/smb. Anyhow, I found none of the Debian release models (Stable/Testing/Sid) within my personal preferences. The connection quality is very good and it's happy with wayland on the host. Snaps are easy enough to disable, but who knows what else they may do. Personally, I'd recommend looking up a Samba config sample and reading through the notes on that. There is "system-config-samba" in Fedora Core 3. I added two more Debian servers for redundancy and demoted my remaining Windows DC's. kvm always ubuntu 20 unless ubuntu 18 is required, hate the frequent updates but has a recent kernel and packages, also snap is included who comes sometimes in handy, also lxd and lxc proxmox well debian cos we got no choice for my bare metals i run centos as i want to avoid rebooting those as much as possible, need those stable as possible I run plain Debian on my server and not needed anything extra network related. In Mint you can use likewise-open-gui to do the same thing with Active Directory. Samba 4 So, I have a samba server running on an Ubuntu machine in my local network. I went with Debian (10. My solution: I am running TrueNAS with a Debian vm with Samba AD DC. Let’s explore it. Of them all, of which the majority are based on Debian, I simply run and install Debian for practically everything from servers to desktops. We will start off by installing Samba on Debian Linux system. Have already installed root, What I've done is to install the samba configuration gui app (ie "Samba" from the software center) But I don't know how to choose a gui'less distro. How should I go about doing this? Currently my server acts as a NAS and a pseudo-hypervisor, with 4 lxc-containers running at all times: plex, sonarr, radarr and samba. I'm partial to OpenSUSE and vanilla Debian myself, but having a solid VM platform under you like you get with Proxmox means you can go nuts with trying things and see what works best for you. So there's no reason you couldn't. I am using an old computer as a samba server, I want there to be no GUI so I did `sudo systemctl set-default multi-user. the way Ubuntu does. install the samba packages. Options for Samba: 1. maybe Ubuntu. Samba GUI page. The big features I like: Can connect to other computers in LAN over Samba protocol and many remote servers over FISH, SFTP, webdav (Nextcloud) This subreddit has voted to protest reddit's changes and will be Ubuntu Samba GUI (Graphical User Interface) is an assembly of graphical tools and services that provide a user-friendly interface and let users configure and manage the Samba shares very easily on Ubuntu. I'm running Ubuntu Server 20. A reddit dedicated to the profession of Computer System Administration. 04 with the wayland session. My issue with Debian is the 2-year release cycle. If you have physical access to your server then attaching a monitor shouldn't be too different to the desktop experience. What should I look for and how should I compare them? Because of their popularity I am between 3 of them but I'm open to new suggestions, too: Ubuntu server Debian (with its minimal install without Maybe do you guys have any guides and/or software that you would use? I was thinking to use things like https://cockpit-project. But spinning up a TurnKey Linux LXC container or even using something like Cockpit installed on a LXC instance is obviously perfectly ok and works just fine. Support Hi there, I'm hoping for a bit of help. I would be surprised if Debian had such a recent version of Samba but they may have backported the problematic code. Do people typically download a GUI onto their home server or just run everything from the command line? I just installed Ubuntu server 20. now with some CLIENTS connecting to the shares may be the bigger pain. 0) because it doesn't add bloat, telemetry, etc. Nothing else out there is as stable or reliable as a Debian install from its stable branch. Headless debian server and would like to have a web gui to improve my QOL. Initially, I also wanted an easy to use gui, but I eventually spent about an hour just reading through and figuring it out. 15. 😆 I’ve been running Debian Linux since the day they released 0. Now, without GUI, I can only login to the one user I created (who has no root privilege) and couldn't even switch off (sudo command not found (?), systemctl poweroff was the only command doing anything and it got three "access denied"). Couldn't agree more. Many swear by "Debian Sid" which is rolling and up-to-date (although sometimes you are better off on "Debian Testing"). I'm trying to set up a minimal, privacy-focused desktop install. just a headless (or gui-less) install of ubuntu, debian, fedora, centos, arch, Debian(Samba) or something, truenas for a beefier NAS needs lots of RAM or just plain OpenBSD A reddit dedicated to the profession of Computer System Administration. 7), create a share that my Active Directory users could access via Samba. org - Samba GUI page" also contains some options but it lists samba apps for a variety I'm the same way, I have no issue with user/group management, it's just a bit less arduous with a gui as I have several users and control access via some custom groups. restart the You might try the gigolo package using Synaptic or "Software Manager" (or just use the command sudo apt install gigolo on your Debian based distro. org/samba/GUI/ But the example conf file that comes with Samba is comprehensive and easy to understand. Ubuntu was created explicitly for I even installed Debian bare bones with only Samba, left the Samba config as stock with only a test share and the problem still occurred until I turned off nmbd. So the tools exist, it depends on the distribution and the Samba version you are interested. Debian is quite "slow to update" (a. This subreddit has gone Restricted and reference-only as part of a mass protest against Reddit's recent API changes, which break third-party apps and moderation tools. Forget ubuntu. It's just a different base install. So you get more recent packages compared to Debian Stable. I'm having a problem setting up a shared folder with samba in ubuntu server. I joined a Debian Samba server to my existing Windows AD, and let it replicate. Subreddit to discuss all the Debian things, the Universal Operating System The same thing in Debian is not included out of the box. I installed Debian from iso on usb in an old windows 7 pc. Man, you have tons of GUI LDAP admin things on Linux, or Windows. 1? Or I need to Samba lets your Linux machine act as a server or client. k. The problem is that, differently from a folder shared from an ubuntu desktop using the gui, I do not see my machine in the "Other Locations: Networks" section of my file manager . But going one step further and attempting to use a passworded share is a no go. Process Flow Chart to Install, Configure longtime truenas/freenas user here, was excited to move to scale due to the underlying linux platform vs freebsd (and therefore the ability to use docker containers and a more traditional VM platform) while it has been mostly workable for me. upvotes Hi all, I have an Ubuntu desktop PC running samba so I can share folders with a windows machine, as well as ssh to control it from windows powershell. I can't remember a single instance where I've installed Debian on a computer (less than 10 years old) where it's failed (I'm still running TESTING on 32 bit machines that I dig out of the trash!). 10 version of Ubuntu for server applications. I had to use mount. The Ubuntu community on Reddit Members Online Completely new to Ubuntu, trying to get a Samba server running; need help. , Here is my conf file: # # Sample configuration file for the Samba suite for Debian GNU/Linux. After working through more incomplete, wrong, or both, pages of documentation that I care to remember, I've managed to get: Ubuntu Server 20. Its pretty lightweight, and you can run whatever distros you want on top. I was trying to do the exact same thing: Debian 10 (Buster 10. then login and add samba as the add-on. It's just bloated Debian and "easier to use" but Debian is easier to install than Ubuntu Server, and after that it's practically the same, no-brainer use Debian. Mint is based on Ubuntu so it probably does as well. # # # This is the main Samba configuration file. I have no experience with Linux as the client but I Longtime Kubuntu user who made the switch to Debian Gnome a while back. Aptitude, apt-get, synaptic, etc. give my user a samba password sudo smbpasswd -a username. I want to achieve Windows Active Directory Replacement for Windows 10/11 Clients. Nextcloud is an open source, self-hosted file sync & communication app platform. You should read the From working IT for years and watching the complete life-cycle of products, Debian Stable does wonders, Debian 5 is not too far behind 10. Or Auto mount Samba shares via GUI . . TL DR: Ubuntu makes Debian more user-friendly. So it wouldn't be too much of a change. I just personally prefer a web GUI whenever possible to configure the basics of Samba and other fundamental things. But you essentially have to upgrade at some point. Oh, and yeah. 78K subscribers in the debian community. Even the guys suggesting Ubuntu don't trust canonical that much. One of the most asked for features for Samba is a graphical user interface to help with configuration and management. they are making sure that the packages are rock solid, granite hard, diamond polish stable); you'd find Linux Mint's packages to be more updated compared to Debian. org on Ubuntu Server for example. I haven't used Linux Mint, but I know Ubuntu used to have a built-in Samba manager. (The older way is phrased to make sure that that name can receive mail from the system). Conversely, why would someone choose pop_os over ubuntu since its based off of that. This is easy since it is available Is there some kind of GUI based configuration tool for Samba. AFAIK ubuntu server runs on the same repos as ubuntu desktop. It's nice if you don't want to do manual scripting (more MS windowsOS Options for Samba: 1. How does Debian with backports enabled compare with Ubuntu? Debian backports are newer versions of software, backported to work with and be compatible with/in Debian stable (and oldstable, while still supported). The two are the same. My daily driver is linux mint. conf the line: smb encrypt = required and it worked fine. "Samba. I would recommend debian over Ubuntu if you know how to use it. They're also supported longer than non-LTS releases. Access & sync your files, contacts, calendars and communicate & collaborate across your devices. Um - no. If you don’t want to run docker in vm, you can obviously install docker on Proxmox host itself, which is exactly the same as how it works on Debian, because it indeed is Debian. Hopefully somebody finds my steps useful, but here is what I wound up doing that got everything working. I then proceeded without setting up a network. https://www. I used this tutorial to set up a Samba NAS with Proxmox and it AWS Linux 2022 is moving to Fedora based, which throws a wrench into established workflows/build patterns, so that might be the push for my group to switch to Debian/Ubuntu instead. I even installed Debian bare bones with only Samba, left the Samba config as stock with only a test share and the problem still occurred until I turned off nmbd. Completely bulletproof and totally reliable. The server version doesn't have a GUI, so it's likely to be more difficult for beginners. I use it to connect it to my Ubuntu development VM, which is Ubuntu 22. It is very easy to add writable samba folders, but I generally do it via the command line, not the GUI. I used to run kubuntu before that with the kubuntu-backports for the latest KDE. These can all be installed with an Ansible script run on CLI on an Ubuntu server, with one command. Will probably also work on Ubuntu. Linux novice looking for best LDAP server with a GUI. are all available on both Debian & Ubuntu and they work Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. Is there something similar for Debian Sarge 3. IF OMV were to meet it's end, I'd just move to straight Debian,. 93r5 back in 1995. smb3 specifically so one system running plex on ubuntu would mount the samba share on a Debian system with open media vault. We keep bringing up that Ubuntu/Linux and yeah XXXX is year of deskptop linux but then we have situations like this. On the other hand, running qemu vm on Proxmox is far more easier than plain Debian because of gui I got to Debian from Damn Small Linux. The great irony that I found Samba AD extremely easy for me to set up, as its architecture is very similar to Windows AD. At this moment I'm kinda stuck between two choices, as I prefer debian based. brenches. samba. People in Europe like to use Fusion Directory or ldapadmin, there are plenty others. you could install cockpit. Both are a good way to share files between Ubuntu and Windows. I chose minimal installation so no GUI which was a mistake because I am not fluent enough in command line and need to trouble shoot some network stuff. Center on Ubuntu, you're gonna have a rough time switching. 16 back to 4. osynko kisw ffm xsbj rronka szsycl nupidg rwqms hrtcg wnitd